While Log4j and JUL are almost conceptually identical, they do differ in terms of functionality. Their difference can be summarized as, "Whatever JUL can do, Log4j can also do - and more." They differ most in the areas of useful appender/handler implementations, useful formatter/layout implementations, and configuration flexibility.
(Reference)
About Me
- Andrew Quach
- Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- I am professional Open Source Technology Officer, tech-savvy, mobile-addictor. Beside, I am an Interista, anti-BPL, anti-Juve, anti-Milan. Write to me for any objection.
1 comments:
That comparision is classic, but it's very old, in fact.
Nowadays slf4j owns all Logging facade framework (even commons-logging), and its native implementation (logback) is much better than log4j :-)
Post a Comment